Real cases

Real decisions.
Documented outcomes.

Three cases from three different industries. Identifying details removed on request. Structural data is real.

Case 01 • Finance • Milan

The CFO who seemed perfect.

“We had already chosen. The report made us step back. Six months later we understood why it was right.”

Impeccable resume, three interview rounds passed brilliantly. Autonomy Drive 94, Relational Reciprocity 22. Structural incompatibility with a collegial board. Not hired. His successor has a 3-year tenure.

Anonymized • HR Director, financial institution 400+ employees

Determining indicators
Autonomy Drive94
Relational Reciprocity22
Pattern identified: Directive leadership in a context requiring collegial consensus.
Program outcomes
Positions evaluated12
Stopped applications3
Counterintuitive profiles promoted2
Retention at 18 months100%
Case 02 • Manufacturing • Germany

The method works in any language.

“What emerges is structure, not lexicon.”

Opening the German office required evaluating German-language profiles. The method showed the same effectiveness.

Anonymized • People Manager, manufacturing 1,200 employees

Case 03 • Retail • Spain

The right counterintuitive decision.

“The perfect candidate on paper. Cognitive Flexibility 29. In an environment that changes every season, we couldn't afford that risk.”

The next candidate, with Cognitive Flexibility 71, has managed 14 stores above target for 14 consecutive months.

Anonymized • HR Business Partner, retail 3,000+ employees

Comparison: two candidates
Candidate A — not hired
Cognitive Flexibility29
Candidate B — hired • 14 months above target
Cognitive Flexibility71

Evaluate the method on real candidates. FREE

Five assessments on us. No credit card. No commitment.

Get 5 Free Assessments →
NeuroMyth Assistant